Writers: Subscribe and send
in your brief bio and your best writing sample (up to 1200 words
to become a
writer. Find free articles and markets to help you get
published. Readers: Find your favorite authors, anthologies,
and other books.
send in your calls for manuscripts. Find writers and manuscripts
to fill your anthologies.
website is best viewed in IE
Lou Jenkins is the award-winning author of
Every Natural Fact: Five Seasons of Open-Air Parenting
"If you combined the lyricism of Annie Dillard, the vision of
Aldo Leopold, and the gentle but tough-minded optimism of Frank
McCourt, you might come close to Amy Lou Jenkins.Tom Bissell
author of The Father of All Things
"Sentence by sentence, a joy to
Phillip Lopate, Author of
Anthologies online participates in various affiliate programs and most links
to books and products in articles/anthologies/author or any page offer some
referral payment, pay for click or other reimbursement. The payment is
generally pennies per click or purchase. Anthologies online also runs paid ads.The
Anthologiesonline web site and newsletter are provided on an "as is" basis
without any warranties of any kind and disclaim all warranties, including
of merchantability, non-infringement of third parties' rights, and the
of fitness for particular purpose. No person or organization makes any
warranties about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of
the material, services, software text, graphics and links. Any communication is generally considered to be
The rift of war between poets Robert Duncan and
One day in early September 1966, the poet Robert Duncan, then 47, was walking to
a streetcar stop in San Francisco when lines of verse began drifting to him out
of nowhere. These poems would appear toward the end of what may be Duncan's
finest book, Bending the Bow (1968), which was written largely in
response to the Vietnam War. He laid out their impetus in a letter to one of his
dearest friends, Denise Levertov, who provided the surge of inspiration: he was
in a "rapture" walking to the streetcar, because he had been listening to a tape
of Levertov reading her poem sequence "Olga Poems." (It would be published in
1971 in To Stay Alive, her anti-Vietnam book, a counterpart to Duncan's.)
Denise Levertov was one of the most important people in Robert Duncan's life.
They had been carrying on a correspondence since 1953, and their letters at
times resembled those of lovers. Within a few years this friendship would
shatter. The story unfolds in The Letters of Robert Duncan and Denise
Levertov, and is analyzed in the essays of Robert Duncan and Denise
Levertov: The Poetry of Politics, the Politics of Poetry, both edited by
Robert J. Bertholf and Albert Gelpi. Ostensibly, the friendship foundered on
their divergent ideas of what a political poem was. What seemed to be a
passionate, but private, intellectual argument escalated to public betrayal.
The two friends took pleasure in their rare meetings--they were often scheming
to fund each other's visits through readings, carefully tallying up the fees and
honoraria. Disagreements and critiques were cushioned by assurances of love:
Levertov: ". . . because to me you are one of the great, as well as belov'd, I
have never & will never speak 'critically' of you to anyone but yourself."
Duncan is even more demonstrative, as in this letter of 1961: "That's what I did
want to write most . . . the ever-lasting delight of these times in my life when
I am actually with you."
By the mid-1960s, questions of craft--not to mention conscience--became subsumed
in the debate over the Vietnam War. Duncan was working on the poems that would
comprise Bending the Bow, Levertov on the poems that would first appear
in Relearning the Alphabet and then be reprinted in To Stay Alive
with an author's preface tying their genesis to the war and her opposition to
it. Both struggled aesthetically with the turn from lyric to public address.
However similar their struggle to write a new political poetry, it became clear
early on that they differed radically in their approaches. The conflict was
twofold: Duncan did not approve of Levertov's activism--he considered group
action coercive and demagogic, at one point saying she was "conscripted" into
activism, thus equating it with the draft--and both of them variously
disapproved of each other's poetic methods.
His letter of March 30, 1968, criticized Levertov's appearance in the Rankin
Brigade Washington protest, broadcast on TV:
Do we believe in unilateral peace? Then surely it is we who
must create it where we are. But the revolution, like Nixon, believes in
inflicting peace on their own terms. I do not ask for a program of Peace; but
I do protest the war waged under the banner of Peace, no matter who wages it.
In so many words, Duncan was warning Levertov that her
protests were so engaged with the war that they were partaking of war
themselves. Finally, utterly shaken, they agreed to put their differences aside
for a year and a day. But only a couple of months later, Duncan struggled to
make amends: "I have begun to see . . . my contention with you as contention
with my own anima." Levertov tried to explain herself too:
. . . what has actually happened is only that I no longer
have the emotional dependency on you, on your approval, I had for so long and
which was not really a good thing.
Neither poet seems to have understood to what extent they had
absorbed the war outside and, like combat veterans, brought it into the
household, dooming it. In 1974, an interview with Robert Duncan appeared in
Out of the Vietnam Vortex: A Study of Poets and Poetry Against the War:
[Levertov]'ll be writing about the war and suddenly . . .
you see a charged, bloody, sexual image that's haunting the whole thing, and
the war then acts as a magnet, and the poem is not a protest though she thinks
This public airing of their unresolved private conflict was
the last straw. Levertov held back for a year, but finally wrote Duncan that
their friendship was "twice broken, deeply betrayed." Six months passed before
Duncan wrote her back, never mentioning the interview. In 1978, at last, he
wrote to praise her book Life in the Forest. Levertov would have none of
To those grappling with the consequences of "free verse" and "organic verse,"
the position of the poet vis-a-vis politics went to the heart of craft as they
were re-visioning it. Duncan and Levertov (and many of their cohorts) did not
view their task as mastering a verse form or even perfecting the stand-alone
poem: it was about crafting a life work, with the relationship between poems,
and between poet and world, replacing form as an end in itself.
There is no bolder declaration of language as ethics--or as the very ground of
ethics, without which principled stances would not be possible. Duncan and
Levertov could not have written such beautiful poems, or made such electrifying
correspondents, had they not been thinkers who engaged the deepest questions
about war, violence, and creation. For, as Levertov wrote, "there comes a time
when only anger is love."
Ange Mlinko's poems and articles have appeared in the Village Voice,
The Nation and Poetry. Her latest book of poems is Starred Wire.
This article first appeared on www.poetryfoundation.org. Distributed by the
Poetry Foundation. Read more about Robert Duncan and Denise Levertov, and their
poetry, at www.poetryfoundation.org.
© 2009 by Ange Mlinko. All rights reserved.